From goodrich Mon Mar 26 09:47:31 2001 Received: from kee.keck.hawaii.edu (kee [128.171.96.130]) by keck.hawaii.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18129; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:47:30 -1000 (HST) Received: by kee.keck.hawaii.edu (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-4.1) id JAA07479; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:47:30 -1000 (HST) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:47:30 -1000 (HST) From: goodrich (Robert Goodrich) Message-Id: <200103261947.JAA07479@kee.keck.hawaii.edu> To: goodrich, aconrad Subject: just to get it written down... X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Content-Length: 2279 X-Lines: 64 Status: RO ----- Begin Included Message ----- From goodrich Thu Mar 8 18:10:21 2001 X-UIDL: fc9abe3dd8067cb4d6b3ae5d6dfe8cfe To: goodrich, aconrad Subject: just to get it written down... Outstanding issues resolved from last e-mail: subc All is fine. (Complicated, but fine.) slit We were using USER* keywords as place holders in the xshow. Fixed this to use the real ones. However, whole spectroscopic setup scenario has not been run through completely. Major outstanding issues: snapi Needs to get checked. corona I haven't added the positional argument. Do we want to? We could require observers to center a target on the spot by moving the field, rather than the coronagraphic spot. If the spot moves too far, you'll get another spot (or something) coming in to the edge of the field, possibly. various Things with valid lists of positions, like "filt" and "fgr" have not all had those lists added to the help text. Some have no valid positions yet (like fgr and sgr). preslit Still potential problems with determining whether there is a slit in the beam or not. I have fixed the "image" command, however, which did not reset "slitname", and this will take care of the specific instance which Eiichi documented. sgr Works OK, but documentation needs to be changed. grand Does not produce random sequences. Al needs to find a better random number generator. lastframe Does not warn against potential overwrite situations. It would need to check the FILEOVWR keyword to see whether it is on or not. If not, then file overwriting will not occur; the frame number will simply be advanced to the next highest number and write a new file, negating the effects of a frame command. (Note that users are not supposed to use "lastframe", but rather "frame".) New ones: goi Need to have a more sophisticated Ctrl-C trap. The first one only catches wfg. Need to propogate this back up to goi and pause to ask whether the user wants to stop the exposure in progress or not. goibuf Confusing the alad server's attempts to send the buffer to the display. Looks like something hard-wired into the alad server? Currently the work-around is to link "/scratch/buf0001.fits" to "buf1.fits". Bob ----- End Included Message -----